Cheryl had this topic on her blog a couple days ago, in which I commented on and got an error. Rather than bugging her in a whiny voice to put it up for me (and when that happens I totally forget what I wrote all of a minute prior), I’ll just steal it for a topic of my own. Now I wonder which path would be more annoying (sorry Cheryl).
I have recently finished two books- both by the same author, Mary Roach. The first is called Stiff: The Curious Lives of Human Cadavers. I saw this one at a bookstore at the airport leaving Pittsburgh. Because it deals with death I thought it would be a lovely book to read before I succumbed to my own death in a crashing plane. Since Spores and I were on our way on a cruise, I though it an appropriate portent as the very first line of the book goes,
The way I see it, being dead is not terribly far off from being on a cruise ship.
This piqued my interest.
The book is indeed about what happens to your carcass when you kick the proverbial bucket, but it does have an underlying message that implies that those who just get stuffed into the dirt are selfish on three levels,
The first is humanitarian. This is basically about those who decide to “take their damned organs” with them to the grave. Uh, hey Selfish Fucker, if you take your organs with you, they’ll rot before the second coming of Jebus anyway, so give ‘em to people who actually need ‘em.
The second is environmental. I am a skeptical environmentalist, but this completely is a logical argument. Aren’t we going to run out of plots of land, from all the sectioned-off bits people lay claim to, oh, say, for ETERNITY!?!?! C’mon, that’s just retarded. And even from a fiscal standpoint, graveyards don’t make sense. I see tons of good, very well located, plots of land that are untouchable. Put a goddamn Starbucks on it and be done with it.
Thirdly, isn’t it kind of, well, BORING to just rot around in a casket? In the book, Mary Roach, claims that she wants to be a anatomy skeleton in a med school somewhere. That’d be a cool job, just hangin’ around!
But the book isn’t preachy, at all. If you want to pick up on the points stated above, you have to be looking for them. They aren’t shoved down your throat, they are subtle; which is why I like Roach’s style of writing.
The book also tells us of how throughout the ages, there was great monetary reward for body snatching in order to study anatomy. This went hand-in-hand with the history of the different methods used to validate the actual death of a person. We also visit the University of Tennessee research field of dead people to see what ooey, gooey mess our bodies decompose to, in different weather, clothing, and position scenerios. Each chapter a different vignette from the last. This is good for the ADHD person. I also recommend it to any macabre and morbid person out there.
The second Mary Roach book I got at a bookstore at the Orlando airport going home. This one is called Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife. Since Roach covered the physical aspect of death in the first book, this time, we delve into what happens to the Soul when our bodies give out. The book describes everything from Victorian era séances to using computers to measure and communicate with bodiless entities, i.e. ghosts. I am very skeptical that anything noteworthy happens at all when life ceases to exist. Before I read this book, I strongly felt and in a way still do that when you Die, You die. That’s it. Finito. Send in the clowns.
Post reading the book, it stirred up my feelings about different dimensions and String/M theory on matter. And again, I am hopeful that there is perhaps another dimension for me to be miserable in.